![]() |
Holy crap, check out the Dangerous Things store! |
Building a RFID Reader |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Rob_
Newbie
Joined: 20 March 2006 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Building a RFID ReaderPosted: 20 March 2006 at 5:30pm |
|
Hey Amal,
I want to build a rfid reader for a university project and was wondering if you (or anyone else) have an info on building the reader? I could easily go out and buy a reader but that wouldnt be much of a project , would it .. We were originally thinking of operating at 13.56MHz but have found that some dev kits are over $2000!! (and they are quite complex!) Been checking out the Phidget RFID reader and it doesnt seem like their are many components on the board. So any info on this topic would be much appreciated! Rob |
|
![]() |
|
amal
Admin Group
Joined: 22 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2065 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2006 at 5:40pm |
|
You're right, the component count is quite low. Building a low frequency reader is fairly trivial. You can buy pre-tuned antenna coils and IC chips that contain all the interrogation and data decoding functions inside them. Check out this post for more info: http://www.rfidtoys.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=29&PN= 1
If you really want to get into the guts of how RFID works, start researching all the different types of "air interfaces" there are for RFID tags and readers. The air interface defines all the specifications for communication between tag and reader, including frequency, data encoding scheme, etc. You can utilize the parts available, or you can make it as complicated as you want by building out the functions of these ICs by hand. I know a guy who has done just that in the low frequency range tags... I'll see if I can't get him to join the forum and chime in with his experiences. |
|
|
Amal ;)
www.amal.net |
|
![]() |
|
Rob_
Newbie
Joined: 20 March 2006 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2006 at 11:05pm |
|
Is it actually any harder to build a high frequency reader than a low frequency one?
if so which parts are harder/more expensive? eg. transmitter, receiver, antenna. ive been getting mixed answers from websites about reader range and want to clear it for good. A higher frequency can read a greater distance. Correct? (Using similar power etc.) EDIT: We need an operating range of about 50cm between reader and tag. would this be possible with a low frequency reader of bout 134kHz? Edited by Rob_ - 20 March 2006 at 11:23pm |
|
![]() |
|
amal
Admin Group
Joined: 22 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2065 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:34am |
|
Generally speaking, the higher the frequency the greater the range. It's a very general statement, but still basically true. Another very generally statement that happens to usually hold true is the higher the frequency, the more sensitive communication is to metallic and liquid interference.
Building an HF reader is more difficult only because of the data encoding and feature set employed by higher frequency RFID tags. The communications protocol between HF tag and HF reader is generally more complicated, with things like read/write, anti-collision, etc. I can tell you that you will have a difficult time getting 50cm out of even 13.56MHz HF technology. People pay good money for commercial systems that work at that range. Range like that might be possible on 13.56MHz if you had a high powered reader and a pro antenna. You might look into 400MHz - 900MHz technology to get that kind of range. Edited by amal - 21 March 2006 at 7:35am |
|
|
Amal ;)
www.amal.net |
|
![]() |
|
abraradib
Newbie
Joined: 20 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 6:31am |
|
hi amal.. I am thinking to integrate both LF and HF reader that might be able to read both frequency at mostly in the same time. Is it possible to do that? I am not gonna build the reader from the scratch but plan to use from of-the-shelf product. If it is possible, which product do you suggest that might be easy for the interoparability for the project like this??
|
|
![]() |
|
amal
Admin Group
Joined: 22 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2065 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 9:47am |
Check this post: http://www.rfidtoys.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=29&PN= 1 In it, there is a link to a cheap Texas Instruments LF/HF reader module. It only works with 134KHz TI low frequency tags, but it's basically what you're looking for. The direct like to the reader is here: http://rfidusa.com/superstore/product_info.php?cPath=37_31&a mp;products_id=284 |
|
|
Amal ;)
www.amal.net |
|
![]() |
|
abraradib
Newbie
Joined: 20 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 10:47pm |
|
Ok thanks amal.. 1 thing I wonder IF i can integrate the HF and UHF reader together?? Is it possible?
|
|
![]() |
|
amal
Admin Group
Joined: 22 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2065 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2006 at 4:57pm |
Hmm, I've not seen any OEM parts or boards or readers out there, but it doesn't mean they don't exist. If you are building your own readers from scratch, I'm sure you could do it. The only thing you'd have to do is use two different antennas, one for HF and one for UHF. |
|
|
Amal ;)
www.amal.net |
|
![]() |
|
Rob_
Newbie
Joined: 20 March 2006 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 May 2006 at 8:25pm |
|
After a bit of mucking around we have decided to up the frequency of operation from 13.56MHz to 915MHz due to a limited read range. As we are operating in UHF we have had to change from inductive coupling to backscatter as a means of communicating with the reader. This means we have to use a directional coupler in order to receive the signal. been reading alot on directional couplers, but not sure which one is valid in our case. the 180 degree directional coupler looks like the most relevant but not too sure. Ive included a pic to fully demonstrate it As i understand it, the antenna is transmitting and receiving the signals at the same time. and the received signal is going to be relatively weak compared to the transmitted signal, so its hard to seperate the signals the info that i have been reading bout the 180 degree coupler seems to say that it will split up the incoming signal into two signals or combine two signals into 1. What i need (as shown in pic) is be able to direct the transmitting signal to the antenna and direct the received signal to the receiver module. What is the correct directional coupler to use? Thanx |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |